- XOJO PRO PRIORITY SUPPORT SOFTWARE
- XOJO PRO PRIORITY SUPPORT PLUS
In terms of number of developers working on any particular platform or technology, WP has the field covered. That means the biggest market on the planet for SaaS products and API markets. There are MILLIONS of small businesses that aren't technology facing that use WordPress, at least tangentally.
Forget the statistics that you see on sites that focus on technology. Simply put, it's the best bang for the buck. WordPress flat out DOMINATES in terms of the number of available developers, and the cost ratio of any metric you can imagine. WordPress has a new REST API interface that handles every thing: authentication, security, end-point publication etc.
WordPress is going to easily eat most of the other technologies listed here. You guys are a little behind on the "inflexibility" of WordPress.
XOJO PRO PRIORITY SUPPORT SOFTWARE
Simple enough for a beginning programmer to get started, yet powerful enough for professional programmers to create commercial software apps. Xojo is a commercial proprietary programming language, IDE toolset, and server-side web app runtime (similar in that sense to Vaadin described above). The vendor sells training, consulting, service, and a few extras such as an integrated testing environment toolset. See my longer Answer to a similar Question. And Vaadin relieves you of having to learn about complicated web technologies, so you can be productive much faster. Java is one of the easier languages to learn, with many resources available including the Oracle Tutorials.
XOJO PRO PRIORITY SUPPORT PLUS
The complicated templating required by common web development frameworks, plus the need to master the various web technologies and languages, makes for a tremendous burden.
I cannot imagine a faster development environment for building web apps (except perhaps Xojo below). And this support gets better all the time. Vaadin has good support for mobile platforms, allowing touch-based interactions. Vaadin is explicitly intended for business-oriented desktop-style apps (as opposed to flashy animated marketing apps). Vaadin easily produces quite professional smart-looking apps with minimal effort. Many many rich libraries available in Java for many varied purposes, especially for business purposes. But this happens under the covers - no need for you to learn the many web technologies as Vaadin handles that on your behalf. The Vaadin framework automagically translates this at runtime to use Web standards technology (HTTP, HTML, CSS, JavaScript, etc.) to render your app within the user's web browser. Briefly: You write your app's business logic and user interface in pure Java. Further, are there any good solutions that integrate basic server side and client side parts such as user account functionality, authentication and dynamic AJAX frontend? What platforms/frameworks would you recommend looking at? I'm not too familiar with everything that lies in between. I guess Wordpress will be too inflexible for this kind of project, and Java might be an overkill. The platform should be such that I may start coding after spending, say, a couple of days learning. I have a degree in software development, but haven't work as a developer in the last decade. Important: I would like to be able to at least participate in development as part of the team. I would like to use ready modules and libraries as much as possible, but need to keep in mind the possibility that customisation will be needed. Mobile app may be the next stage, so website may need to expose some kind of API in future.ĭevelopment process should be flexible and fast. The website should look modern and have intuitive dynamic interface allowing user to get what they want with minimum efforts. Third party APIs (such as Stripe for payments, Facebook for there will be no massive backend apart from integration of a few. So basically I'm trying to pick the right platform/language for a productivity tool/web app that will essentially implement a user account with a simple workflow and some minimal user interaction functionality.
0 kommentar(er)
